In terms of instructor actions, what can revocation result from?

Revocation in the context of instructor actions typically results from deficiencies in training. This means that if an instructor fails to meet established standards or guidelines necessary for effective teaching, their certification or ability to instruct can be revoked. Such deficiencies may include inadequate knowledge of the subject matter, poor instructional strategies, or failure to implement effective assessment methods.

The goal of having high standards is to ensure that all instructors are equipped to provide quality education. This maintains the integrity of the instructional program and safeguards the learning environment for students. Therefore, when an instructor does not demonstrate the required competencies, it is essential to address these deficiencies, and if they persist, revocation becomes a necessary action to uphold educational standards.

Other factors such as lack of participation in training, frequent tardiness, or disagreement with policies, while potentially problematic, do not directly lead to revocation in the same way deficiencies in training do. These issues may warrant different types of disciplinary actions or interventions rather than a complete revocation of certification.